Traditional/Indigenous Technologies
for Combating Desertification
Traditional knowledge
and practices have their own importance
as they have stood the test of time
and have proved to be efficacious
to the local people. Some of these
traditional practices in the fields
of agriculture - crop production,
mixed farming, water harvesting, conservation
of forage, combined production system,
biodiversity conservation, forestry,
and domestic energy, to mention a
few. These are briefly described below.
Traditional/Indigenous Technologies
in Agriculture Crop
production
The tank system is traditionally the
backbone of agriculture production
in semi-arid region. Tanks collect
rainwater and are constructed either
by bunding or by excavating the ground.
It is estimated that 4 to 10 ha of
catchment is required to fill one
ha of tank bed. In the Thar Desert,
traditional systems of land and water
use met environmental challenges in
various ways.
The limited crop-growing
season led early inhabitants to rely
on animal husbandry and farming of
hardy millets in the summer season.
However, one group of indigenous cultivators
(Paliwals) devised arainwater-harvesting
technique fully capable of growing
winter season crops. As early as the
15th century, the Paliwal cultivators
followed a unique practice of water
harvesting and moisture conservation
in suitable deep-soil plots.
These plots as also
surrounding catchment area were developed
with care and managed to make the
system a self-contained unit for winter
cultivation. Under conditions of intense
evaporation, the moisture threshold
and soil fertility was maintained.
The total energy input, rainwater,
sand-silt-clay accumulation, and the
cultivator’s own activities
were interwoven into a complete production
system of winter crops. There was
a progressive increase of yields every
year as more and more fresh silt,
clay and humus accumulated and widened
the vertical and horizontal dimension
of such plots.
The ratio of farmland
and catchment area was regulated to
be 1:11 so that the critical supply
of moisture was maintained. This is
known as the Khadin system of cultivation.
In this system, the nearby uplands
and rocky grounds are also used as
catchment for collecting rainwater.
There are still as many as 500 big
and small khadins covering a total
area of about 12,140 ha. Another indigenous
system known as Achar and Pine suited
to low lying areas of Bihar was developed.
In Tamil Nadu, the
practice of nangai-mel-pangai (dry
crops on wetlands) was common. If
the monsoon seemed not to be promising
at the planting time, farmers would
plant high quality dry crops, usually
ragi or cholam (varieties of millet),
under tank irrigation. If the season
looked good, they would plant paddy.
In Central India, a very old cultivation
system based on water harvesting and
runoff farming in the Narmada valley
locally known as haveli still exists.
This system is location specific,
like other indigenous runoff farming
systems of the country. It is practiced
in areas with black cotton soil. Fields
are embanked (average height of embankment
being 1 m) on four sides. Rainwater
remains in the field until the beginning
of October. A few days before sowing
rabi (winter) crops, the excess water
is drained off. Water is let out very
gradually. The cultivators know from
long experience which field ought
to be drained first. The water from
one field enters into another, and
then another till it joins the natural
drainage or lake. There is a mutual
understanding amongst the farmers
as to when to release the water.
Bhil tribals developed another system
called patt. The principle of this
system is simple and comprises bunding
(embankment) of a stream at a point
to provide astatic head of 30-60 cm,
sufficient to divert water into the
irrigation channel. The gradient of
the channel is less than the gradient
of the streambed and climbs to a height
varying 3-25 m. This system allows
double cropping.
Mixed farming
The bulk of natural resource base
of the arid region is most suited
to pasture based livestock farming.
The traditional wisdom of the dryland
farmer clearly manifest in the evolution
of system of mixed farming –
including crop and animal husbandry
– which matched the potential
and limitations of the natural resource
base. The misuse of land, namely ploughing
the lands best suited to natural grasses
was rectified by the practice of crop
and long fallows (bush fallow) rotation.
Traditional
Water Harvesting Systems
India has a rich history of use of
traditional systems of water harvesting
in almost all the States. Conservation
of both surface and groundwater has
been an integral part of India for
many centuries. Archaeological records
are available of their use by ancient
civilizations in India. In fact, ponds
and tanks represent an important community
resource for drinking water in rural
India even today. The main attributes
to their success are the sound scientific
knowledge and methods on which they
have been built.
The types of water
harvesting are different depending
on the physio-topography and rainfall
pattern of the region and the extent
of rainfall. However, many of these
traditional practices were abandoned
during and after the colonial rule.
India also has high levels of ground
water, which have supplemented the
surface waters especially during lean
season as well as in regions which
are rainfed. The types of systems
and water harvesting practices in
the different parts of India have
been explained in a lucid manner in
the Fourth Citizens’ Report
“The Dying Wisdom” of
the Centre for Science and Environment,
New Delhi. The storage of even the
scanty rainfall, through simple as
well as extensive types of traditional
water harvesting of surface and ground
water have been the important sources
of water in arid regions such as Rajasthan
and Gujarat.
These include surface
water systems such as the lakes, talabs,
nadis, canals and groundwater systems
such as wells, Kunds or Kundis, baoris,
and johads. These practices have often
saved the drought-affected regions
from problems of water famine. The
serious problems of water shortages
in many parts of the country, particularly
during this year’s drought,
are being largely attributed to the
discontinued use of traditional water
harvesting practices. The programmes
of the Government such as the DDP,
DPAP and the integrated watershed
projects have an element for harvesting
the traditional water system and involvement
of the local communities in the maintenance.
Success Stories
of Use of Traditional Water Harvesting
Systems
In the sandier tracts of the Thar
Desert, the villagers have evolved
an ingenious system of rain water
harvesting known as Kunds/ tankas,
the local name given to a covered
under ground tank was developed primarily
for tackling problem of drinking water.
These are either owned by communities
or privately. Village ponds (nadis),
Kundis and tankas in Rajasthan and
virdis in Gujarat were common for
meeting the drinking water needs of
the inhabitants. In Southern India
tanks and their catchments had religious
importance and were not polluted.
Traditional Water Harvesting
Systems
A. Types of Surface Water Systems
Nadis: Nadis are village ponds
used for storing water from
an adjoining natural catchment
during the rainy season. A nadi
is essentially a natural surface
depression. Some have stone
walls built for extra storage
and for water retention. Most
villages in Rajasthan have their
own nadi and the site of nadi
is selected by the villagers
based on the available natural
catchment and its water yield
potential. Water availability
from a nadi would range from
two months to a year after the
rains.
The location of a nadi had a
strong bearing on its storage
capacity due to the related
catchment and runoff characteristics.
Nadis were heavily relied on
for human and livestock needs.
A survey done by the Centre
for Science and Environment
found that the drought affected
districts of Nagaur, Baramer,
and Jaisalmer were found to
have 1436, 592, and 1822 nadis
respectively. They meet 37%
of the water needs. The Jodhpur
town has about 25 nadis in and
around it. However, the water
is not very suitable for human
consumption but are important
source of water for livestock
and for irrigation and for recharge
of wells.
Talabs: Talabs are ponds and
are water reservoirs situated
in valleys and natural depressions.
Tanks: In other districts of
Rajasthan, tanks stored water
during the monsoon, for drinking
purpose . Tanks are in situ
structures with massive masonry
walls on four sides and floor.
They are either square or rectangular
and have an enormous water holding
capacity. Tanks were provided
with an efficient system of
canals to bring rainwater from
the catchment areas in the outskirts
of the town or city.
Lakes: Very deep depressions
of talabs form lakes. The Padmasar
and Ranisar lakes in Rajasthan
are good examples of lakes,
which even today are important
sources of drinking water. Overflow
from talabs and lakes, especially
during the monsoons, help in
the recharge of wells and baoris.
Earlier these could support
a large township round the year
and a major part of the year.
But with increasing destruction
of the catchment area, and poor
state of canals, these lakes
are not getting adequate water.
Khadin: Khadins consist of earthen
embankments to capture and conserve
the surface runoffs in agricultural
fields. The local people grow
natural vegetation upstream
Khadins, which binds the earth
and checks wind erosion.
Canals: Canal systems consist
of numerous water courses, channels
and aqueducts to carry rainwater
to the city’s various
tanks, nadis and talabs.
Johads: Johads are water collection
barriers and are essentially
embankments to arrest rainwater
during the monsoon.
The Johad bed is subsequently
used to cultivate crops.
B Groundwater Systems
Kunds or Kundis (circular pits
with dome like covering) have
long been used as storage reservoirs
in the water scarce districts
of Barmer, Nagaur, Bikaner,
Chru districts in Rajasthan
.
Wells: Wells are deep underground
pits lined by cemented masonry
. This is the most common system
of harvesting of groundwater.
Baoris: Baoris are community
step wells. Shallower than wells,
they have the capacity to hold
water to almost its full capacity
as the system lets very little
evaporation. The baoris in Jodhpur
district have been an important
source of drinking water.
|
Conservation
of Forage Resources
The pastoralist (nomadic cattle rearers/breeders),
based on their centuries of experience,
developed a unique method of water
harvesting for the most effective
utilisation of their grazing lands
and also for ensuring their revival
and growth during the successive years.
With the commencement of rains, the
population was divided into different
caste groups and dispersed to their
tobas (small dug out ponds) along
with their livestock. The tobas were
situated within the confines of the
village boundaries but outside the
settlement proper. If water in one
toba was exhausted its users were
not allowed to come back to the village
but had to make use of another toba
where water and fodder might still
be available, and by convention they
had to be allowed the facility of
using the water and grazing resources
there. It was only when the water
in all the tobas was exhausted that
the entire population, along with
their stock, returned to the village
proper and were allowed to use the
water in the village tank and the
lush growth of grasses around the
village. Severe penalties were imposed
on graziers for violation of regulations
designed to control grazing and water
use from tobas. The Jagirdar (feudal
landlord) imposed animal grazing tax
( ghas-mari) and periodic free gifts
( laag) especially from owners of
large flocks of sheep and goat, which
acted as a strong deterrent against
indiscriminate grazing. With the abolition
of Jagirdari, the practice of ealising
grazing tax was discontinued resulting
in free ranging and consequent degradation
of rangelands.
Combined
Production System
The practice of agroforestry viz.,
cultivation in spaces between trees
and shrubs, has been traditionally
practised by the desert dwellers.
For example, Prosopis cineraria in
cultivated fields and Ziziphus mauritiana
in rangelands are common in arid and
semi-arid parts of Rajasthan. The
communities have a strong belief that
trees and shrubs not only provide
fodder for livestock but also increase
crop growth under their canopy. And,
as cultivation of crops alone is a
big gamble in arid areas, most desert
dwellers follow mixed farming to minimise
risk against total crop failure, in
which animal husbandry is an important
component. Density of P. cineraria
varies from 20 to 40 trees per ha
in cultivated field of flat alluvial
plains having deep (100-150 cm) sandy
loam to sandy clay loam soils underlain
by kankar pan in 350-450 mm rainfall
in Shekavati region of Rajasthan.
In dryland regions planting of trees
along field boundaries, roads and
around homesteads and watering points
for shade is a common traditional
practice.
Protection
of Vegetative Cover- Sacred Groves
There are several scared tree groves
dedicated to temples spread over the
entire country. Communities zealously
protect these groves against interference
of any kind. These groves are excellent
examples of biodiversity conservation.
For example, it was religiously prohibited
to cut any vegetation from the lands
in the immediate vicinity of temples
and religious places, known as Oran
(protected forest) lands. Collection
of dry wood only was allowed for fuel
and serious punishment was prescribed
for using an axe in Orans. In Barmer,
Jaiselmer, Nagaur, Jodhpur, Pali,
Sikar, Jhunjhunu, and Jalore districts
of Rajasthan there are still 420 Orans
covering a total area of 100,140 ha.
Some customs observed by the Bishnoi
community in Rajasthan and Haryana
helped to conserve vegetation and
wild animals. An incident that occurred
over 250 years ago in Khejadala village
in Jodhpur district in Rajasthan is
a dramatic example, in which Bishnoi
women zealously sacrificed their lives
by hugging their Prosopis cineraria
( khejri) trees rather than allowing
these to be cut down. There can be
little doubt that these strategies
emanated from people who had a strong
concern for preservation of their
environment and its ecosystems, an
attitude which enabled societies to
conserve their resources through “oral
fencing”.
Water Utilisation
Practices
A useful indigenous technique of water
conservation called pitcher planting.
Earthen pitchers with holes on one
side are embedded near the root zone
of newly planted seedlings to provide
it with the required amount of water.
This technique prevents loss of water
either due to evaporation or seepage
and helps in seedling establishment.
This technique is still practiced
by melon cultivators in arid region
of Rajasthan. Similarly, these farmers
bury bushes in a chess board pattern
(similar to stubble mulch) to protect
melon plants from getting buried by
shifting sands. These techniques have
been successfully adopted in arid
zone afforestation in the country
and else where. Dryland farmers raised
windbreaks ( matt) around their fields
and homesteads to protect crops and
their livestock against hot desiccating
winds.
Energy
Lopping of trees such as Prosopis
cineraria, Azadirachta indica and
Ailanthus excelsa during winter season
for leaf fodder is still a common
traditional practice in arid and semi-arid
regions of Rajasthan. The branches
and twigs are used as firewood. The
practice of lopping trees during winter
season has been found scientifically
sound, as it causes no damage to trees
for they are dormant and by then all
the food is translocated to roots.
Storage of
Grains/Tubers
In some parts of the country tightly
woven rope baskets are used to protect
rice against rats for up to five years,
unlike the plastic bags that are now
used in many areas. The farmers of
Malwa region of Madhya Pradesh have
been successfully storing potato crops
in dug out pits lined with bricks
from times immemorial. Following this
technology, potato crop can be stored
for a period of at least four months
and their carbohydrate content has
been found to be less than the ones
stored in cold storage. This technology
is reported to have aroused world
wide interest.
Need for
Suitable Integration of Traditional
with Modern Technologies
Technology is not neutral. Political
and economic forces both drive it
at the macro and micro level of development
planning. Most development projects
have involved the injection of technologies
from outside the community. Rarely
have development projects relied on
indigenous technologies and on traditional
knowledge of the people. Technology
choice has usually been influenced
by external factors such as national
and state government policies and
the policies of external donor agencies.
Village ecosystem planning should
try to integrate the best in traditional
knowledge with the best in modern
science and technology. India is a
country where people have lived for
thousands of years and have carefully
observed their environment to develop
their survival systems. As a result,
traditional technologies and practices
are usually rooted in ecological wisdom
and the social traditions of local
communities. Modern technologies,
however, aim to increase productivity,
usually through an intensive use of
external inputs. For this reason,
modern technologies are often very
capital intensive and demand new skills
that are often missing in the villages,
and thus tend more to mystify than
enlighten.
More over, the high productivity wrought
by modern technology can be sustained
only if it is based on production
systems that are ecologically sound.
There is, therefore, a need to integrate
the best elements of modern and traditional
technologies in areas like landuse,
agroforestry, water conservation,
etc. Some of the traditional technologies
discussed here offer promising entry
points for developing packages on
community-based dryland resource management
technologies. While these changes
in the strategy would result in better
implementation of these programmes,
the participation of local communities
may also lead to greater use of traditional
practices. It is, therefore, necessary
to document such knowledge base through
a properly designed research programme
and to analyse their economic, technological
and socio-cultural sustainability
for optimisation of their use. Such
a programme would be initiated in
cooperation with non-governmental
organisations (NGOs) within the NAP
framework.